THE IMPACT OF THE PHENOMENON “NO VIRAL, NO JUSTICE” ON LAW ENFORCEMENT IN DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASES IN INDONESIA

Authors

  • Hilman Nur Fakultas Hukum Universitas Suryakancana
  • Ardelia Lananda Fakultas Hukum Universitas Suryakancana
  • Cindy Claudia Simbolon Fakultas Hukum Universitas Suryakancana
  • Mila Arastasya Rahmah Fakultas Hukum Universitas Suryakancana
  • Nayla Ratu Baidhowi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Suryakancana
  • Pusfa Januwati Fakultas Hukum Universitas Suryakancana
  • Muhammad Gilar Dika Fakultas Hukum Universitas Suryakancana
  • Muhammad Agung Tri Cahya Fakultas Hukum Universitas Suryakancana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55551/jip.v6i1.325

Keywords:

Domestic Violence (DV), Social Media, No Viral, No Justice, Law Enforcement, Victim Protection

Abstract

The phenomenon of “No Viral, No Justice” has become a highlight in handling cases of Domestic Violence (DV) in Indonesia. This phenomenon reflects the public perception that justice is often only achieved if cases of Domestic Violence (DV) receive widespread attention on social media. The purpose of this study is to analyze in more depth the law enforcement system for domestic violence crimes in Indonesia based on applicable laws and regulations, identify the factors causing the emergence of the phenomenon of “No Viral, No Justice” in law enforcement of domestic violence in Indonesia and examine the impact of the phenomenon of “No Viral, No Justice” on the effectiveness of law enforcement officers in handling domestic violence crimes in Indonesia. The method used in this study is the normative legal research method. This research method is carried out by examining problems and processing data obtained from legal regulations in accordance with existing regulations and rules or norms as the basis for research. The results of the study indicate that the phenomenon of “No Viral, No Justice” on social media can accelerate the law enforcement process and increase public pressure on law enforcement officers to act. However, this phenomenon can also pose risks, such as trials by the media, violations of victim privacy, and potential disinformation. In addition, dependence on virality can divert attention from systematic and sustainable efforts to address Domestic Violence (DV), so efforts are needed to strengthen effective and reliable mechanisms for protecting victims of Domestic Violence (DV).

References

Abdurohman, Imanudin. “Daftar Kasus KDRT Di Indonesia 2024, Korban Mayoritas Perempuan.” Tirto.Id. Last modified 2024. Accessed March 8, 2025. https://tirto.id/daftar-kasus-kdrt-di-indonesia-2024-g62T.

Aminah, Siti, and Ony Rafsanjani. “Implementasi Restorative Justice Untuk Menanggulangi Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga: Antara Konsep Dan Praktik.” Restorative: Journal of Indonesian Probation and Parole System 1, no. 1 (2023): 55–73.

Basri, Moh. Hasan, Hartoyo, and Subekti. “Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga (KDRT) Di Polres Lumajang Jawa Timur.” Court Review: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum 5, no. 3 (2025): 85–94.

Bhakti, Indira Swasti Gama, and Tri Agus Gunawan. “Upaya Preventif Aparat Desa Dalam Penanggulangan Kasus Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga.” Journal of Public Administration and Local Governance 4, no. 1 (2020): 49–64.

Bidayati, Kholis, and Suci Ramadhan. “Pendekatan Viral Justice Sebagai Upaya Pencarian Perlindungan Bagi Korban Kasus KDRT” 2 (n.d.): 60–80.

Christianti, Risa, and Elfrida Ratnawati Gultom. “Penyimpangan Proses Hukum Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga Dalam Kategori Delik Biasa.” Unes Law Review 5, no. 3 (2023): 1389–1399.

Faebuadodo Gea, Antonius. “Hukum Progresif Dalam Penanganan Masalah Sosial Oleh Kepolisian.” Jatiswara 37, no. 3 (2022): 271–279.

Fatmi Yurindra, Dita, Budi Sutrisno, and Septira Putri Mulyana. “Pengaturan Perlindungan Konsumen Dalam Perjanjian Endorsement Antara Endorse Dan Endorser.” Jurnal Commerce Law 3, no. 2 (2023): 351–358.

Granady, Seffin, Abdul Halim Nasution, Rintan Gustia, Dinda Pratiwi, and Alnisha Agustin. “Kekuatan Media Sosial Untuk Advokasi: Tinjauan Yuridis Dan Strategi Komunikasi Digital.” Jurnal Studi Multidisipliner 9, no. 1 (2025): 370–378.

Gussela, Melinda Dina, Mila Kurniawati, Jemmy Satria N, Denny Hermanto, Silvanus Fauziansah, and Beni Ahmad Saebani. “Fenomena ‘No Viral No Justice’ Perspektif Teori Penegakkan Hukum.” Ranah Research: Journal Multidisciplinary Research and Development 7, no. 2 (2025): 792–800.

Kodai, Dince. “Kajian Tentang Penelantaran Ekonomi Sebagai Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga.” Gorontalo Law Review 1, no. 1 (2018): 89–99.

Al Mustaqim, Dede, Fadlih Abdul Hakim, Hikmah Atfalina, and Abdul Fatakh. “Peran Media Sosial Sebagai Sarana Partisipasi Warganet Dalam Mewujudukan Keadilan Dan Akuntabilitas Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia.” Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development 1, no. 1 (2024): 53–66.

Nababan, Grace Oktavia, Elsa Ramadhana, and Asep Suherman. “Prinsip Penegakkan Hukum Melalui Fenomena ‘No Viral No Justice’ Guna Mencapai Keadilan Di Era Media Sosial.” Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Terpadu 8, no. 10 (2024): 1–8.

Nyoman, Widyani. “Analisis Peran Polri Dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga Di Kabupaten Jembrana.” Pariksa: Jurnal Hukum Agama Hindu 3, no. 1 (2015): 12–20.

Putera Semadi, Anak Agung Gde. “Peran Media Sosial Dalam Upaya Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia.” Ijolares: Indonesian Journal of Law Research 2, no. 1 (2024): 14–19.

Rossevelt, Franklin Asido, Dara Aisyah, Pasha Clara Ulyna Nadeak, Nadhirah Zahrahni, Putri Nabiha Dwiriani, Noni Fitria Achmad, Hilda Anggiani Siregar, Valentino Antonius Simamora, and Abednego Ferdian Malona Siallagan. “Analisis Pengaruh Budaya Patriarki Terhadap Kekerasan Perempuan Di Dalam Rumah Tangga.” Sajjana: Public Administration Review 1, no. 2 (2023): 1–13.

Salman, Aulia, and Andi M Yusuf. “Integrasi Prinsip Keadilan Hukum Islam Dalam Mengatasi Fenomena No Viral No Justice Di Indonesia.” Siyasah Wa Qanuniyah : Jurnal Ma’had Aly Raudhatul Ma’arif 2, no. 2 (2024): 71–94.

Sari, Ikka Puspita. “Keabsahan Perjanjian Kontrak Elektronik Dalam Transaksi E- Commerce Di Tinjau Dari Hukum Perdata.” Jurnal Al-Wasath 3, no. 2 (2022): 105–112.

Sibarani, Sabungan. “Prospek Penegakan Hukum Undang-Undang Penghapusan Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga (UU PKDRT).” Jurnal Hak Asasi Manusia 7, no. 1 (2016): 1–9.

Silitonga, Michael Mauliutus, Aartje Tehupeiory, and Andree Washington. “Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 Di Pengadilan Negeri Brebes.” Honeste Vivere Journal 33, no. 2 (2023): 161–184.

Sormin, Rachelia Febriani, Dheny Wahyuni, and Aga Anum Prayudhi. “Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga.” Pampas: Journal of Criminal Law 2, no. 3 (2021): 109–120.

Sriwidodo, Joko. Pengantar Hukum Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga. Cetakan Pe. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kepel Press, 2021.

Tirtakusuma, Eleazar Josiah, and Andreas Eno Tirtakusuma. “Viral Sebagai Sarana Pembelaan Diri (Kajian Kemungkinan Penuntutan Pidana Dalam ‘No Viral No Justice’).” Jurnal Selisik 10, no. 1 (2024): 4–24.

Published

2025-04-18

How to Cite

Nur, H., Lananda, A., Simbolon, C. C., Rahmah, M. A., Baidhowi, N. R., Januwati, P., … Tri Cahya, M. A. (2025). THE IMPACT OF THE PHENOMENON “NO VIRAL, NO JUSTICE” ON LAW ENFORCEMENT IN DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASES IN INDONESIA. Ius Publicum, 6(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.55551/jip.v6i1.325

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)